ISSN No.  0975-0312 [Print]

DOI: 10.66718/vsj 

Vedic Science International Multidisciplinary Peer-reviewed Journal 

The articles below are the official digital versions of peer-reviewed papers from the print edition of the Vedic Science Journal.

Article  Information

Journal: Vedic Science
Volume: 28 | Issue: 3 | Year: 2026
Pages: 115–136
DOI:  https://doi.org/10.66718/vsj.v28.i3.10    
Received: 28 July, 2026
Accepted:  4 Sept., 2026
Published: 30 Sept., 2026

Gītā's Witness V/S Smith’s Impartial Spectator

Prof. Balbir Singh SihagProfessor Emeritus of Economics, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Abstract

This article advances three interlocking arguments concerning the philosophical genealogy and structural character of Adam Smith’s impartial spectator. First, it contends that the impartial spectator as presented in The Theory of Moral Sentiments is fundamentally a legal–juridical construct: it applies pre-existing rules of conduct in the manner of a court of judicature, is structurally indexed to the coercive vocabulary of punishment and resentment, and operates as an external regulatory mechanism rather than an instrument of genuine ethical formation. Second, the article challenges the received scholarly claim that Smith’s moral philosophy inherits its central framework from Aristotle, arguing that Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics does not constitute a universal ethical theory in any recognisably modern sense but is instead a teleological catalogue of virtues calibrated to the free male citizen of the Greek polis, embedded in a specific cultural and political formation that cannot be transposed without loss into Smith’s sentimental system. Third, and most substantially, the article argues that the conceptually richer, structurally more precise, and historically antecedent parallel to Smith’s spectator is the Vedic–Gītā figure of the Witness (Sākī/Ketrajña), whose attributes — unconditioned awareness, non-partisan interiority, and character-forming self-inquiry — supply precisely what the impartial spectator lacks. The article calls for a methodological reorientation in the history of moral philosophy toward sustained engagement with the Vedic philosophical inheritance.

Keywords

Adam Smith; impartial spectator; Aristotle; virtue ethics; Vedic philosophy; Bhagavad Gītā; Sākī; Ketrajña; moral formation; legal positivism; comparative philosophy.

References

Primary Sources

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1999.

Bhagavad Gītā. Translated by Swami Gambhirananda. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, 1984.

Bhadārayaka Upaniad. In The Principal Upanishads. Translated by S. Radhakrishnan. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1953.

Kaha Upaniad. In The Principal Upanishads. Translated by S. Radhakrishnan. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1953.

Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976. [Cited as TMS with part, section, chapter, and paragraph numbers.]

Śvetāśvatara Upaniad. In The Principal Upanishads. Translated by S. Radhakrishnan. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1953.

Secondary Sources

Annas, Julia. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

de Nittis, Gianni. “Ancient Sources in Adam Smith’s Theories of Sympathetic Morality and Imagination: Aristotle’s Thought and The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Diciottesimo Secolo 9 (2024).

Deutsch, Eliot. Advaita Vedānta: A Philosophical Reconstruction. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1969.

Forman-Barzilai, Fonna. Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Griswold, Charles L. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Haakonssen, Knud. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Hanley, Ryan Patrick. Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Irwin, Terence. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

Matilal, Bimal Krishna. Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

Mohanty, J. N. Classical Indian Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.

Montes, Leonidas. Adam Smith in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

Otteson, James R. Adam Smith’s Marketplace of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Pollock, Sheldon. “The Sanskrit Cosmopolis, 300–1300 CE.” In Ideology and Status of Sanskrit, edited by Jan E. M. Houben, 197–247. Leiden: Brill, 1996.

Radhakrishnan, S. Indian Philosophy. 2 vols. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1923.

Raju, P. T. The Philosophical Traditions of India. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1971.

Raphael, D. D. The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Vivenza, Gloria. Adam Smith and the Classics: The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith’s Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

paper

PDF – 77.4 KB 152 downloads

How to cite this article

Sihag, B.S. (2026). Gītā's Witness V/S Smith’s Impartial Spectator. Vedic Science, 2026 (3), 115-136. ISSN: 0975-0312 (Print). DOI:  https://doi.org/10.66718/vsj.v28.i3.10   

Copyright (c) 2026 by the Author/s

This article is published under the  License (CC BY 4.0).